> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://experience-digital-transform.gitbook.io/experience-digital-transformation/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://experience-digital-transform.gitbook.io/experience-digital-transformation/regulations/component-5/digital-credentials.md).

# Digital Credentials

What digital credentials regulation actually governs — trust services, legal standing in sectoral law, and the verification infrastructure — building on the learner registry.

A digital credential is a digitally issued, digitally verifiable attestation that a learner has completed a defined course of study or demonstrated a defined competency. It is not a new type of qualification — the qualification it represents is governed by existing sectoral education law. What digital credentials regulation addresses is the technical and legal infrastructure that makes the digital form of that qualification reliably verifiable by third parties. The risks at stake are forgery and diploma fraud, non-recognition of qualifications across borders, and dependence on issuing institutions that may merge, close, or lose their archives.

The regulatory foundation for digital credentials has three components.

**Trust services legislation** — the electronic signature and seal framework — is the most critical: it establishes the legal equivalence of a qualified electronic seal from an educational institution to a physical institutional seal, and it creates the trust infrastructure (certificate authorities, registration of institutional identities) that makes digital credentials verifiable. Without this foundation, a digital certificate is just a PDF — it cannot be verified by an employer or a university in another jurisdiction without contacting the issuing institution directly, which defeats the purpose of digitalisation. This is the [Category 7 digital identity and trust services](/experience-digital-transformation/regulations/component-1-the-landscape-of-digital-transformation-regulations/track-b-digital-government-enabling.md#digital-identity-and-trust-services) foundation discussed at national level in [National Learner Registry Governance](/experience-digital-transformation/regulations/component-5/national-learner-registry-governance.md).

**The legal standing of digital credentials in sectoral law** is the second component. Most countries' education laws specify that certificates must be issued in a particular physical form or with particular physical characteristics. Enabling digital issuance requires amending or supplementing these provisions. This is typically a lower-complexity legislative task than enacting trust services legislation — but it is frequently overlooked, producing a situation where technically capable digital credentials lack legal standing in the domestic legal system.

**The interoperability framework for credential verification** is the third component. A national credential verification system — a registry of issued credentials that can be queried by third parties — transforms the credentials ecosystem from a bilateral (issuer to holder) to a multilateral (issuer to holder to verifier) architecture. This is the infrastructure that enables employers to verify qualifications online rather than requesting physical documents, and that enables cross-border recognition without bilateral institutional contact. Its governance requires decisions about who can query the registry, what data is disclosed in a verification query, and how long credentials are maintained in the registry.

{% hint style="info" %}
**EXAMPLES IN PRACTICE — Digital credential instruments**

The EU's eIDAS Regulation is the reference model for trust services: qualified electronic seals give institutional credentials legal equivalence across twenty-seven jurisdictions. Europass Digital Credentials builds the education-specific issuing and verification layer on top of that foundation. India's DigiLocker demonstrates a different architecture — a state-operated document wallet through which examination boards and universities issue digitally signed certificates directly to citizens, verifiable by any employer.
{% endhint %}

For the fuller comparative treatment of this category — including why "digital credentials" is a technical abstraction rather than a single legal category, the W3C Verifiable Credentials standard, and the Lisbon Recognition Convention — see [Component 3's Digital Credentials profile](/experience-digital-transformation/regulations/component-3-comparative-analysis-of-regulations/digital-credentials.md), which also covers the [credentials legal framework](/experience-digital-transformation/regulations/component-1-the-landscape-of-digital-transformation-regulations/track-b-digital-government-enabling.md#digital-credentials-and-certification) (Category 9) referenced above.

Credentials that cannot be trusted are only one of the risks this chapter addresses. [Student Data Protection](/experience-digital-transformation/regulations/component-5/student-data-protection.md) turns to the risks that arise before a credential is ever issued — while a learner's record is still being built.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the following URL with the `ask` and `goal` query parameters:

```
GET https://experience-digital-transform.gitbook.io/experience-digital-transformation/regulations/component-5/digital-credentials.md?ask=<question>&goal=<user_goal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is what the user is ultimately trying to achieve, the reason they need the answer. Sharing it helps GitBook give you a better, more relevant answer. A goal is most helpful when it describes the outcome the user wants rather than restating the question. For example, with `ask=how do I create an API token`, a goal like `automate deployments from our CI pipeline` lets GitBook tailor the answer to that use case.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.